Skip to main content

Social media and the 'Housing Market'


Housing is a big topic in Aotearoa. Whether it’s about finding, owning, fixing, buying, selling or not having one, we all need some kind of home. The issue of homelessness has been on the rise. According to the NZ Herald (2016), “between 2006 and 2013, the rise in homeless people outstripped population growth. New Zealand's population grew by 4.8 per cent over this period, while the number of homeless grew by 25 per cent”. And what’s happening here in NZ is reflected in other developed nations. As stated in a report on homelessness by OECD.org (2017) “homelessness has increased in recent years in Denmark, England, France, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands and New Zealand, but fallen in Finland and the United States”. Research into homelessness in New Zealand by the University of Otago, (2016) found that “homeless increased significantly over the past decade. Based on the most recent three Census rounds, in 2001 there were 28,649 homeless, 34,000 in 2006, and 41,207”. With these statistics in mind, it seems that economic development is no real measure of social development.

It’s not surprising that Kiwi’s are somewhat aghast and befuddled by this. On one hand, housing and accommodation is seen as a necessity (a bit like air, food and water) and on the other hand, housing has become a market. Conversely, the ‘housing market’ is something dreamt up by corporations to remove ethical limitations to the necessity of housing as a requirement to societal welling in my opinion. Comical satirists Clark and Daw, produced a skit about neoliberal marketism and made a mockery of its nonsensical rationalisation to undermine the society which markets require to exist.

It appears we’ve become quite opinionated on the topic of housing and where better to unleash it than Facebook? Social media platforms act like a release valve, either just to vent also to question and reform ideals. Below, Facebook posts point the finger the previous National Leader John Key. Well, it’s Sir Dr John Key these days. Sir Dr Key or Teflon John as he’s been affectionately referred to by news media has only one regret. That Kiwi’s didn’t buy into his scheme to replace the flag and has no beef with people living rough on the streets.  



Other National Party members also cop some flack on this issue and fair enough too. Below, Paula Bennett gets the beat up about housing issues and things get kind of personal.



Facebook allows public expression and helps to inform about what’s important to us and our ‘friends’. How successful this form of public communication is at creating change remains to be established. The saying “a problem shared is a problem halved” comes to mind. By sharing and commenting on the social and environmental issues we face, communities become engaged with the problems and possible solutions. And that’s what freedom of speech and democratic process is all about.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Improved Outcomes for Fisheries in New Zealand

The Price of Fish In 1986, the New Zealand government introduced the QMS (Quota Management System) to regulate fishing in the country's coastal waters, which extend 200nm offshore and are divided into 10 Fisheries Management Areas (FMAs). Under the QMS, most fish species are subject to catch quotas within the Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and the Total Allowable Commercial Catch (TACC). The TACCs are reviewed annually by MPI (Ministry for Primary Industries), and based on fish populations, the appropriate TACCs are allocated to the FMAs. These TACCs are further divided into Individual Tradeable Quotas (ITQs), which are permanently given to commercial fisheries for free. This reflects the neoliberal policy decisions of that era, where public assets were divided among private interests as a means to generate wealth for the elite. Neoliberal economics assumes that wealth will trickle down from the wealthy to working-class citizens. However, this approach has led to fisheries feudalism, ...

Kiwi Home Building Schemes

Misleading or confusing news stories makes for tedious reading. I’ve found an article from Scoop titled KiwiBuy the only answer to the housing shortage which was written as a media release by the Salvation Army. This story falls mainly within the confusing bracket, however, it could be argued that when confused, readers can become lost and therefore miss the point completely. The title makes a bold and somewhat biased statement; for starters there are 101 things that could make buying or building a home more affordable. So to say, ‘KiwiBuy is the only way’ is in my opinion somewhat short-sighted.   Maybe the title could say, “KiwiBuy scheme makes housing more affordable for low income bracket”. The lead-in sentence states, “Growing homelessness, rent rises and struggles for private investors could be on the way without serious changes to the housing market, The Salvation Army says”. Does this mean private investors will be struggling less? Also, what is meant by hous...

Political Point Scoring & Industry Capture

From where we stand, it seems that central government is being strongly influenced by private interests to push for the development of Port Tarakohe. TDC looks to be the messenger in this Provincial Growth Funding process , however, council seems to be avoiding proper community consultation on the proposed development. Council is being compelled by higher forces and it needs to act fast to access funding. Offices of central government appear to be captured by industry, and ministers from respective parties seem eager to be perceived as delivering growth to provinces. ‘More jobs’ and ‘economic growth’ being their unchallenged mantra . Not surprisingly, this ‘growth mindset’ dictates our path going forward, whether we want it or not, whether it’s good for the environment or not, or whether it’s sustainable or not. The proposed business case for Port Tarakohe has become a political point scoring event. An event where certain ministers puff out their chests when claiming growth ...