Skip to main content

Questionable Public Private Partnerships?




The mussel farming industry in Golden Bay has recently increased their efforts to control a larger area of Port Tarakohe. When there’s money to be made, there seems to be strong support from local and central government. With the Provincial Growth Fund looking to put money into the Port, it may raise questions for some. Who is driving the growth? Why do we need such growth? And who benefits most from it?


It seems TDC is right behind the growth agenda and keen to promote the need for growth. Should the council as a ‘neutral’ governing body really be pushing an industry’s growth? Furthermore, how can such an industry be truly sustainable when taking infrastructure resources, energy consumption for farming, processing and exporting into account?

These are all questions which get us to look deeper and bring further awareness of a growing local issue. And yes, there are reduced Co2 targets to add to the mix. With Climate Reality becoming more more accepted, how does supporting growth of an industry that relies heavily on using fossil fuels fit within the desired Co2 reduction framework? The Ministry for the Environment are claiming "New Zealand is on the path to a low emission, climate resilient future; the Government aims to reduce our emissions to net zero by 2050".

For residents, the increase of mussel boat noise is evident, especially as the boats tend to start operating around 3 or 4am. Is this not antisocial behaviour and why not operate during normal business hours? Of course the health and safety aspect has been brought forward, however, as other industries such as mining exemplify, keeping expensive machinery operating longer hours, means less down time and increased profits. 

For those wanting to complain about mussel boat noise, section 16(1) of the Resource Management Act states, "Every occupier of land (including any premises and any coastal marine area), and every person carrying out an activity in, on, or under a water body or the coastal marine area, shall adopt the best practicable option to ensure that the emission of noise from that land or water does not exceed a reasonable level". Who determines what is reasonable and who will enforce the law? 



As Port Tarakohe grows, it seems logical that noise and traffic will also, according to TDC, production outputs from the mussel farms is predicted to increase form around 4,000 tonne per annum to 47, 000 tonne annually. The increased area of farms is also set to grow another 2,000 hectares. In regards to the ‘proposed’ Port Tarakohe Development, TDC states “This project is of national significance to the aquaculture sector and is vitally important to realising the commercial aspirations of Maara Moana”.

From what can be gathered, Maara Moana is a private company based in Nelson. Who owns this organisation and why is TDC actively promoting their commercial aspirations? A quick Google search on Maara Moana uncovered little, however, the company looked to be registered at a residential address in Atawhai with two names as directors. Marc Ferris of 13 Werneth St Atawhai, Nelson and Che-huang Tung of 15 Lynton Rd Bucklands Beach, Auckland. 

TDC must be seen to be independent of commercial influence and in many instances, this may not be the case. Corporate sponsored governance is in my opinion not part of true democratic process. It is important to view business interests and their desire for growth with careful consideration. History shows us clearly that business booms can collapse due to mismanagement, greed, lack of regulation, environmental harms or natural disasters.  We do need to move forward very carefully and consider our impacts more so now, than ever before in our history. 

The wider environment is ours to enjoy and protect, so let’s hold governance to account and ensure their corporate sponsors aren't making decisions that will adversely affect us now or into the future.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Improved Outcomes for Fisheries in New Zealand

The Price of Fish In 1986, the New Zealand government introduced the QMS (Quota Management System) to regulate fishing in the country's coastal waters, which extend 200nm offshore and are divided into 10 Fisheries Management Areas (FMAs). Under the QMS, most fish species are subject to catch quotas within the Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and the Total Allowable Commercial Catch (TACC). The TACCs are reviewed annually by MPI (Ministry for Primary Industries), and based on fish populations, the appropriate TACCs are allocated to the FMAs. These TACCs are further divided into Individual Tradeable Quotas (ITQs), which are permanently given to commercial fisheries for free. This reflects the neoliberal policy decisions of that era, where public assets were divided among private interests as a means to generate wealth for the elite. Neoliberal economics assumes that wealth will trickle down from the wealthy to working-class citizens. However, this approach has led to fisheries feudalism, ...

Kiwi Home Building Schemes

Misleading or confusing news stories makes for tedious reading. I’ve found an article from Scoop titled KiwiBuy the only answer to the housing shortage which was written as a media release by the Salvation Army. This story falls mainly within the confusing bracket, however, it could be argued that when confused, readers can become lost and therefore miss the point completely. The title makes a bold and somewhat biased statement; for starters there are 101 things that could make buying or building a home more affordable. So to say, ‘KiwiBuy is the only way’ is in my opinion somewhat short-sighted.   Maybe the title could say, “KiwiBuy scheme makes housing more affordable for low income bracket”. The lead-in sentence states, “Growing homelessness, rent rises and struggles for private investors could be on the way without serious changes to the housing market, The Salvation Army says”. Does this mean private investors will be struggling less? Also, what is meant by hous...

Political Point Scoring & Industry Capture

From where we stand, it seems that central government is being strongly influenced by private interests to push for the development of Port Tarakohe. TDC looks to be the messenger in this Provincial Growth Funding process , however, council seems to be avoiding proper community consultation on the proposed development. Council is being compelled by higher forces and it needs to act fast to access funding. Offices of central government appear to be captured by industry, and ministers from respective parties seem eager to be perceived as delivering growth to provinces. ‘More jobs’ and ‘economic growth’ being their unchallenged mantra . Not surprisingly, this ‘growth mindset’ dictates our path going forward, whether we want it or not, whether it’s good for the environment or not, or whether it’s sustainable or not. The proposed business case for Port Tarakohe has become a political point scoring event. An event where certain ministers puff out their chests when claiming growth ...